Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from Commons:VIC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this:

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list:

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
56,487 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
50,842 (90%) 
Undecided
  
3,132 (5.5%) 
Declined
  
2,513 (4.4%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

View promotion
Nominated by:
Ercé (talk) on 2024-09-22 06:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Linaria cannabina (museum specimens) (common linnet (mediterranea))
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-22 08:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Fiat 600 (2023) - left rear view
Used in:
de:Fiat 600 (2023)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-22 08:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Toyota ProAce City Electric - left front view
Used in:
en:Citroën Berlingo

 Support --Thi (talk) 21:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-22 08:35 (UTC)
Scope:
Škoda Octavia IV Combi Facelift - right rear view
Used in:
de:Škoda Octavia IV

 Support --Thi (talk) 21:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-22 08:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Peterbilt 384/386, right front view

 Support --Thi (talk) 21:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-22 09:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Kenworth T700, right front view
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-09-22 14:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Piazza del Popolo (Cesena), view from Salita del Nuti.
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-22 15:34 (UTC)
Scope:
Peterbilt 389, left front view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-09-22 19:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of Sint-Antoniuskathedraal, Breda, statue on cathedral's facade.
Used in:
Sint-Antoniuskathedraal (Breda)
✓ Done, adjusted the scope ReneeWrites (talk) 07:17, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2024-09-22 20:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Going to church by Pancho Fierro

 Support Best in scope and used. --Tagooty (talk) 14:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Ezarateesteban on 2024-09-22 20:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Aline Masson con tocado de gasa by Raimundo Madrazo
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-22 22:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Dashboard of Kenworth T680, inside view
Used in:
Global usage
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-09-23 04:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Saxidomus gigantea (Butter Clam), left valve
Reason:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
-- Llez (talk)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-23 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
André-Joseph Salis, dit Bibi la Purée by Geo Dupuis

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 15:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-23 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Sobreporta (Overdoor) by Antoni Gaudi - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-23 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Tramonto a primavera - Lino Selvatico

 Comment The scope links to the wrong CAT. --Tagooty (talk) 14:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-09-23 09:22 (UTC)
Scope:
Arc de Diane (Cahors)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-23 11:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Opel Zafira Life (Facelift) - right rear view
Used in:
de:Opel Zafira Life
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-23 11:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Peugeot Boxer (2014) with crew cabs - left front view
Used in:
de:Peugeot, de:Fiat Ducato, de:Società Europea Veicoli Leggeri Sevel, de:Vorlage:Zeitleiste SEVEL-Eurobus-Modelle
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-23 11:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Audi SQ8 e-tron - right rear view
Used in:
de:Audi Q8 e-tron
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-23 14:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Purney Bridge, Zanskar - view from downstream
Used in:
en:Purnewikidata:Q130252352
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-23 14:56 (UTC)
Scope:
Shila, Zanskar - welcome arch, view towards Shila
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-23 15:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Amar Mahal Palace, Jammu - front and right facades
Used in:
wikidata:Q4740023
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-09-23 15:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Wesley Cathedral, Mysore - front facade
Used in:
wikidata:Q130352732
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-09-23 19:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Exterior of Duomo (Urbino) - Dome

̈Geolocation and other missing info added. Thanks. --Terragio67 (talk) 14:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Terragio67 (talk) on 2024-09-23 20:14 (UTC)
Scope:
Castello Estense della Mesola - view from East
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Túllio F (talk) on 2024-09-24 00:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Forte do Castelo de Belém, front view from Dom Frei Caetano Brandão Square
Used in:
d:Q10284097->
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-09-24 04:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Chlamys islandica (Iceland scallop), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-24 05:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Signora con pappagalli - Giuseppe De Nittis

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-24 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Blagnac - Statue de Saint-Exupère de Toulouse

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-24 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Course de taureaux par Eugenio Lucas Velázquez - Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-24 07:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Porsche 911 GT2 RS MR - left front view
Used in:
de:Porsche 911, de:Porsche 911 GT2, de:Manthey-Racing, de:Porsche 991
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-24 07:03 (UTC)
Scope:
BMW G42 M240i - left rear view
Used in:
en:BMW 2 Series (G42)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-24 07:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Suzuki Swift (2017) hybrid - left rear view
Used in:
de:Suzuki Swift
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-24 16:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Compitalia in museum Louvre-Lens
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-24 16:48 (UTC)
Scope:
Dashboard of Freightliner Cascadia (2008)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-09-24 17:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Open sailing boat LE 59 De Vier Gebroeders. Historic sailing ship. (Starboard side).
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-09-25 04:59 (UTC)
Scope:
Chlamys islandica (Iceland scallop), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-25 04:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Insegna dell'arte dei Linaroli (tessitori di lino) - Correr Museum
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-25 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Enoplognatha ovata- dorsal side on Daucus carota

 Support Best in scope; I would add "female" to the scope. --Llez (talk) 04:56, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-25 05:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Frises du château de Vélez Blanco - Le Colisée - Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-25 09:54 (UTC)
Scope:
The Awakening of Psyche (Museum Louvre-Lens)

 Support --Thi (talk) 11:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Atudu (talk) on 2024-09-25
Scope:
Catapaecilma subochrea (Yellow Tinsel) - ventral
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Msb (talk) on 2024-09-25 19:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Cyprus Historic & Classic Motor Museum - exterior view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-09-26 04:50 (UTC)
Scope:
Pecten maximus forma maculata (Great Scallop), right valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-26 05:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Ritratto della moglie - Francesca con cappello nero by Lino Selvatico

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-26 05:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Well head Campo Santa Marina in Venice.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-26 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Poble escalonat - Joaquim Mir - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-26 09:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Horse-drawn carriages Coupé d'Orsay in Stables of Chambord castel, right front view

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 16:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gnom (talk) on 2024-09-26 13:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Saraswati veena‎ (a classical Indian musical instrument)
Used in:
en:Saraswati veena, de:Vina
Reason:
great photo donated by a musical instruments museum -- Gnom (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-26 16:32 (UTC)
Scope:
Suzuki Swift (2017) hybrid - left front view
Used in:
de:Suzuki Swift
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-26 16:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Peugeot e-3008 - right front view
Used in:
de:Peugeot 3008, en:Peugeot 3008, en:List of Peugeot vehicles
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-09-26 16:40 (UTC)
Scope:
SsangYong Torres - left front view
Used in:
de:KG Mobility, de:SsangYong Torres, en:KG Mobility, de:KGM Torres
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-09-27 04:37 (UTC)
Scope:
Inflorescence of a Verbena bonariensis purpletop vervain
  •  Support Useful and used. --Terragio67 (talk) 05:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support There are 112 inflorescence images for this species in the scope-link (including others by the photographer) but this one stands out with a superb specimen, focus-stacking for sharpness front-to-back and a uniform uncluttered background. IMO a little cropping of empty space at the top of the frame would further enhance the image but this is a personal opinion. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-27 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Paradis (model, 1592–94) for the Gloria del Paradiso of the Doge's Palace in Venice (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-27 05:08 (UTC)
Scope:
La Diligence sous l'orage par Eugenio Lucas Velázquez - Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-09-27 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Field of Buckwheat (sketch) - Joaquim Vayreda - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 09:40, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-09-27 09:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Horse-drawn carriage Unalserre et Bernin in Stables of Chambord castel, right view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Thi (talk) on 2024-09-27 11:13 (UTC)
Scope:
John Everett Millais, The Blind Girl - Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery
Used in:
en:The Blind Girl, en:Birmingham Museum and Art Gallery, en:Vagrancy
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Msb (talk) on 2024-09-27 19:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Government Office of the Slovak Republic in Bratislava
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

 Support This one has more representative colouring on the abdomen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 19:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.