Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates:
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for Featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Simple tutorial for new usersAdding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate image description and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using Note: Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process. Alternatives are for a different crop or post-processing of the original image, or a closely related image from the same photo session (limited to 1 per nomination), if they are suggested by voters. VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
|
Table of contents
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 20:50:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
- Info The Sundering of Elves and names given to their divisions. Created by Agnaton - uploaded by Agnaton - nominated by Agnaton -- Agnaton (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Reason: The divisions of elves in Tolkien's works are a very complex matter. This diagram organizes practically all the knowledge in this area and presents it in the most accessible way possible. This image has also previously been assessed using the Quality image guidelines and is considered a Quality image.
- Support -- Agnaton (talk) 20:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment As of 18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC), there is a typo above "NANDOR": "le" should probably be "led". Also, using an image for something that's essentially a text table doesn't seem the best choice in terms of accessibility (searchability, text-to-speech, …). 217.9.50.231 18:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wow so it is possible to search and select text inside the image when opened as SVG in a modern browser. So it's not as unsearchable as I had wrongly presumed. 217.9.50.231 18:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's "left", some conversion issues. Corrected it :) Agnaton (talk) 19:29, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh wow so it is possible to search and select text inside the image when opened as SVG in a modern browser. So it's not as unsearchable as I had wrongly presumed. 217.9.50.231 18:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2024 at 11:11:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
- Info created by me -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose All of those tents and garbage bags ruin the impression for me, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- hello dear they are not garbage : they are cans for waters and tools to challenge a long hiking in the Tassili n'Ajjer plateau. It is a camp view. IssamBarhoumi (talk) 11:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose For a camping view, this is too dark, and for the natural scenery, camping equipment is in the way. --Tmv (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination thank you all i ll do better next time IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 19:40:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
- Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 20:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool textures Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quite an interesting pattern but otherwise nothing special for me.--Ermell (talk) 07:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 18:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Egypt
- Info created by Mona Abo-Abda - uploaded by Mona Abo-Abda - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose This is a well composed photo but it's a little noisy and I'm not sure I like black and white here. Cmao20 (talk) 21:05, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Black & white fits very well with the architecture style. Yann (talk) 13:39, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 18:27:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Moldova
- Info Interior of the Curchi Monastery, Curchi, Moldova. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support But a HDR in this case should be better --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:45, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support The only down side is the light reflection in the middle, but how this could be avoided? Yann (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 18:13:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Machines
- Info created by NASA - uploaded by BotMultichillT - nominated by Henrysz -- Henrysz (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Henrysz (talk) 18:13, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool, but the image description could do with some work to tell us more about what we're looking at here Cmao20 (talk) 18:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:51, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tmv (talk) 13:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 13:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created, uploaded, and nominated by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 13:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Great composition and lovely to get a mating pair but I'm not fully convinced by the sharpness. I appreciate you've provided a very high resolution file which is great. I made this downsample which is 9.4 megapixels and is mainly sharp, so on that basis I think it's okay. Cmao20 (talk) 15:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- thanks for your valuable comment Anitava Roy (talk) 16:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 12:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
- Info created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support In spite of various CAs, it is interesting and different enough that I think it can be FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 12:04:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nymphaeaceae
- Info created and uploaded by Bilby - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:04, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Could be sharper but it's a nice composition and I like that it's almost high-key Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support A nice three dimensional feel to it Henrysz (talk) 21:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:05, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 11:14:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:50, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 08:58:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media#Cartoon
- Info created by Bernhard Gillam (1856-1896) in 1882, and published in the humor magazine Puck after President Arthur signed the Chinese Exclusion Act. Uploaded and nominated by Peulle -- Peulle (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Peulle (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, and interesting with the header. I would add a little bit more light. Yann (talk) 09:06, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great reproduction. Cmao20 (talk) 12:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 07:43:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Sweden
- Info Årstabroarna are two parallel railway viaducts in central Stockholm, Sweden, passing over the watercourse of Årstaviken and the islets Årsta holmar, they connect the major island Södermalm to the southern mainland district Årsta. The eastern bridge (left), the older of the two and still often referred to as Årstabron ("The Årsta Bridge"), is still in operation almost 100 years after its inauguration in 1929. The bridge, on its completion the longest bridge in Sweden, was designed be the architect Cyrillus Johansson. A western bridge (built for commuter train), designed by Sir Norman Foster, was finally inaugurated in 2005. For transparency: generativ AI was used to remove some small lens flares
- Created, uploaded and nominated by --ArildV (talk) 07:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)ArildV
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very eye-catching composition, nice light. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 11:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great mood Cmao20 (talk) 12:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 13:20, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. Very nice. --XRay 💬 17:55, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:02, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 04:51:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Family Ranunculales
- Info Empty seed pod of a monkshood (Aconitum) in decay. Focus stack of 30 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:32, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very sharp and interesting photo Cmao20 (talk) 12:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:09, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:59, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Oct 2024 at 04:29:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by TAPAN1412 -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TAPAN1412 (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support V nice. I can't find any FPs of this species. Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 22:47:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Japan
- Info Morning view of the pond at Oizumi Ryokuchi Park. c/u/n by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Laitche (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Placid and tranquil, good light, great image quality. I might crop a tiny bit of the sky so there's the same amount of room above the tree as below the reflection. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info New version uploaded (Brighten + Crop change) --Laitche (talk) 20:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 12:45:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Games
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 12:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I feel like there is a bit more white space on the right than the left, maybe worth checking. Great photo. Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. I think that it is also necessary to create a more appropriate category in FP Wilfredor (talk) 13:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- 'Objects#Games', perhaps. The dice, the cricket ball and the billiards from the current gallery subsection could also go into there. Cmao20 (talk) 16:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and created this, if someone disagrees with me they can revert. Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- This makes me think, is this a game or a sport? Wilfredor (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and created this, if someone disagrees with me they can revert. Cmao20 (talk) 16:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's White's turn? Right? Wolverine XI 19:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Non, it’s Black's turn, and the best move is Nxe4 (Knight takes e4). This move allows Black to control the center, black sacrifices the e4 pawn temporarily (romantically) to gain activity and piece coordination. This tactic was used by Paul Morphy, particularly in his famous 1858 game against Duke Karl Wilfredor (talk) 19:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 00:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:03, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 11:27:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and beautiful butterfly Cmao20 (talk) 13:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unlike what we're used to seeing, I would have preferred a lower-angle shot (worm's-eye view), but you can't have everything in life. The reflection and the contrast between the delicate elements and the mud make this photo worthy of being a Featured Photo. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 10:39:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
- Info En-Vau calanque, Calanques National Park, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France. No existing FPs. Created, uploaded & nominated by kallerna —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support —kallerna (talk) 10:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Super high resolution and satisfying composition, spectacular view. Strong candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Motif is outstanding, but technical quality is below the FP-bar in my eyes. The overexposed clouds are large and disturbing. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 19:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but the clouds to the left, as pointed by Milseburg above, are overexposed. Wolverine XI 20:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Milseburg. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:41, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharpness is ok to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 08:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great motif, and quality is ok for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternate version
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
- Info Alternate version without the clouds.
- Support —kallerna (talk) 14:29, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This is a different picture, not an alternate version of the nomination above. Please nominate it separately. Yann (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I much prefer the original. This tighter composition doesn't really work for me. Cmao20 (talk) 16:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Me too --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 09:08:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
- Info Red helleborine (Cephalanthera rubra), found on Ulrichsberg mountain, Carinthia, Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:18, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Oct 2024 at 00:24:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Groups
- Info Interesting example of yokohama-e, works of ukiyo-e depicting non-Japanese that emerged following the opening of Yokohama to foreigners. Created by Utagawa Yoshikazu - uploaded and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 10:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting and good quality Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 20:29:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Thailand
- Info High resolution, sharp photo of interesting place with beautiful light + colours. No FPs of this place, and this is the only QI. created by BigDom - uploaded by BigDom - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
Good but some edit could be done, anoted.--Mile (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mile You have a keen eye. I'm going to say the spots/streaks were insects, there were quite a few down there by the river. I have removed the ones you noted plus a couple more that the spot visualiser highlighted. Thanks, BigDom (talk) 10:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the nomination! BigDom (talk) 10:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good. --Mile (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:42, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:19, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 20:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created by Shougissime - uploaded by Shougissime - nominated by Shougissime -- Shougissime (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shougissime (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment - Would reframing this to avoid the flag/banner help? I see that the exposure is a bit high (highlights on helmet), but not to the point that I'd oppose. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment How about this composition? --Laitche (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Per above crop. Would support. --Mile (talk) 10:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
NeutralI'd support a version that crops out that corner of the banner, because apart from that I think this is a good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support now, great. Cmao20 (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment You're right, I cropped as per Mile proposal and reduce highlight on helmet to recover some details. --Shougissime (talk) 16:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Much better. Thank you. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lucky to get this path of cycler, angle was not so changed, otherwise i would never catch them bellow 1/800. If they would go more tangent even faster than that. --Mile (talk) 17:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 23:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support for the cropped version. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:25, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:19, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 17:34:13
- Info It is rare that I nominate an image for delisting but this one struck me in the category as obviously well below the standard. Not even 3 megapixels for a very common bird and nothing is really sharp, IMO not QI let alone FP. Barely passed in 2007. Also downsampled to make it appear sharper (see original nomination) which is against guidelines. I will soon nominate this as a replacement. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. BigDom (talk) 00:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Thi (talk) 10:56, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist --Peulle (talk) 07:02, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --Harlock81 (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 13:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Italy
- Info [Valadier] (Giuseppe) was a neoclassicist architect and designer and urban planner in Italy. Looking at the list of his works, there is not a work by Valadier that is not simply gorgeous. This is the Cathedral of Urbino's dome (1789-1810). Created, uploaded and nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 13:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Could find some minor mistakes, but if this could be some MB less would be even better - hard to open. --Mile (talk) 10:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Minor issues fixed (e.g. stitching errors) and 10% file size reduction. Thanks for your remarks. Terragio67 (talk) 19:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 11:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Great, interesting motif but IMO too noisy (EXIF data indicates ISO 5000, would explain why) and I don't like the fact that it seems to have been pasted onto a plain white background, I'd prefer a more natural or gradient background Cmao20 (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I assume these settings were used as the museum didn't allow a tripod? Anyway, as Cmao20 says the result is too noisy for FP. Some of the white parts of the design also seem blown out and have no detail left. BigDom (talk) 00:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 10:50:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
- Info all by Anitava Roy -- Anitava Roy (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Anitava Roy (talk) 10:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:03, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 13:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:33, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 13:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 10:29:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info created by unknown photographer from the Auschwitz Erkennungsdienst, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann -- Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info "Selection" of Hungarian Jews on the ramp at Auschwitz-II-Birkenau in German-occupied Poland, May/June 1944, during the final phase of the Holocaust. Jews were sent either to work or to the gas chamber. The photograph is part of the collection known as the Auschwitz Album, which was donated to Yad Vashem by Lili Jacob, a survivor, who found it in the Mittelbau-Dora concentration camp in 1945. See Auschwitz Album, Yad Vashem: "The Auschwitz Album is the only surviving visual evidence of the process leading to mass murder at Auschwitz-Birkenau."
- Support Historical image with high educational value, restored. FP on English Wikipedia. -- Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is a very important testimony that should be promoted because of its significance to contemporary history. The technical quality should be disregarded in view of its significance. In the last 15 years I have visited Auschwitz and Birkenau several times and have studied the dark German history intensively. It is important to keep the memory alive in order to pass on the lessons to future generations. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hard to look at, but that's why we should look at it Cmao20 (talk) 13:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support – A disturbing, but important photograph. —Bruce1eetalk 13:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:32, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above... ... --Terragio67 (talk) 14:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:13, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 21:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 09:45:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
- Info Ksar Aït Benhaddou, Marocco (أيت بن حدو، المغرب). My shot. -- Mile (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good composition + colours Cmao20 (talk) 13:01, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tmv (talk) 13:58, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great vibrance and composition. Terragio67 (talk) 14:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Your shot is a beautiful shot.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:11, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:22, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 02:42:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:42, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The composition is IMO spoiled a bit by the line of bottles along the bottom Cmao20 (talk) 13:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your vote. The partially cut bottles enhance the cultural context, as cachaça is typically consumed at Brazilian barbecues, adding depth to the narrative without distracting from the main focus. I initially considered removing them, but a store employee told me not to, so I chose to respect their placement to reflect the authentic supermarket environment Wilfredor (talk) 13:57, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2024 at 00:31:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely facade and nostalgic 80s look. The slope of the street not only causes discomfort, but also inevitably draws my gaze to the white line and the dirt accumulated on the pavement. Despite the many eye-catching elements of the facade, the place fails to stand out against the visual distractions of the building behind it. However, what really makes feel bad is the complete absence of people at the entrance, giving the impression of a place abandoned or on the verge of closing. Additionally, the crooked white sign on the right distracts. In summary, many elements, but none strong enough. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good selfportrait Frank, i would support if you clean a bit of CA. Annoted. --Mile (talk) 07:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- CA correction was turned on during the development; I don't see any in the uploaded file. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:35, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good picture (but is it me or is it tilted?) -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- In order to avoid tilt, I routinely use the level on the back screen of my camera. I also double-ckecked for tilt after running a perspective correction on Capture One (which is usually pretty precise). The slight slope of the street and the white centerline might cause this impression. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- That's what I thought, thank you for the clarification! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:54, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- In order to avoid tilt, I routinely use the level on the back screen of my camera. I also double-ckecked for tilt after running a perspective correction on Capture One (which is usually pretty precise). The slight slope of the street and the white centerline might cause this impression. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 09:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:09, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:24, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Anyway. --Mile (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 18:37:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Italy
- Info Mesola Castle is one of the 19 prestigious residences of the [Este] family, also called Delizie degli Este (Este's delights). It is located in the municipality of [Mesola] in the province of Ferrara, in the north-eastern part of Italy. To all intents and purposes it is a fortified palace, difficult to photograph due to the almost never cooperative light, with imposing dimensions for the small town that hosts it. it is almost 25 meters high with a square architectural layout with four crenellated square towers at the corners. I assure you that the amazement of having this building in front of you was certainly greater than this photo. C. U. N. by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing! Nice light, good image quality, superb resolution, and satisfying composition. Cmao20 (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Quality is superb, but the castle itself looks distorted and unnatural due to perspective correction. Sorry. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:57, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose More pic you put into panorama harder is to solve lines, especially looking upward. Why dont you put some angle and make it more natural. --Mile (talk) 06:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Alternative three points perspective version
- Info According to @Екатерина Борисова and @Mile remarks, I decided to create a new thre points perspective version. @Cmao20 and @Radomianin , please, I kindly ask you again to check and evaluate this new version too. Thank you all. --Terragio67 (talk) 12:54, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't really care that much about perspective correction in an example like this, as long as consistent and symmetrical. Both approaches have advantages and drawbacks. Cmao20 (talk) 12:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Regarding the first version, I admit that the optical effect seems exaggerated at first glance, but the geometric shape shows almost straight lines after perspective correction. Nevertheless, I find the wider version more pleasing in its composition than the alternative. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think beter, at least not loking as flower. If subject went to much high some middle lane perhaps help. Suppose crop also help. --Mile (talk) 14:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one looks better, The top photo seems a bit too steep.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:07, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:23, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 17:57:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Settlements#Switzerland
- Info No FPs of this picturesque and well-known place. Bit of noise on the hills but I don't mind when the composition and light are this good. created by Elpi77 - uploaded by Elpi77 - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:20, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:02, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I miss coordinates and EXIF data. Not sure whether it's a drone photo. If it is, it should be categorized as such. --A.Savin 08:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:10, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support But see comment from A.Savin.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I added coordinates, but there's not a lot I can do about EXIF. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your effort.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Hmm, how do you come to this geolocation? Either the photographer was standing on the ground -- but then, looking at Google streetview, I don't think this location is correct (see the slopes at the left). Or this is indeed an aerial/drone shot -- but then not only this location is possible and without EXIF and response from the photographer we never can be sure, right? --A.Savin 22:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure that the houses in the picture are located in a place named Rivaz 15 kilometers North from Lausanne. The car park depicted is next to the Centrale Hidroelectrique le Forestay. According to the panorama's background, the camera location is compatibile with a place named Forestay, located in the south part of Chexbres, maybe, Chemin de la Plantaz. Can you double check, please? Terragio67 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did almost exactly the same photo a few years ago with same lighting, same time of the day and of the year and exact same place (but with more snow on the mountains) and I can confirm it's Rivaz and that this picture can only be taken with a drone -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't question the town in the picture. It's more about precise camera location: if there's no EXIF data and we cannot expect a statement from the photographer, then we can only estimate: use {{Location estimated}}. --A.Savin 14:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Camera location appearing on the file right now is wrong (46° 28′ 27.27″ N, 6° 47′ 38.71″ E) and suggesting it would be Saint-Saphorin, which is not the case (it's Rivaz). Right camera (drone) location with only 10-20m margin error is 46°28'38.0"N 6°46'36.4"E -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, now that makes sense IMO, thanks. Support --A.Savin 16:20, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Camera location appearing on the file right now is wrong (46° 28′ 27.27″ N, 6° 47′ 38.71″ E) and suggesting it would be Saint-Saphorin, which is not the case (it's Rivaz). Right camera (drone) location with only 10-20m margin error is 46°28'38.0"N 6°46'36.4"E -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't question the town in the picture. It's more about precise camera location: if there's no EXIF data and we cannot expect a statement from the photographer, then we can only estimate: use {{Location estimated}}. --A.Savin 14:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did almost exactly the same photo a few years ago with same lighting, same time of the day and of the year and exact same place (but with more snow on the mountains) and I can confirm it's Rivaz and that this picture can only be taken with a drone -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:51, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- I'm quite sure that the houses in the picture are located in a place named Rivaz 15 kilometers North from Lausanne. The car park depicted is next to the Centrale Hidroelectrique le Forestay. According to the panorama's background, the camera location is compatibile with a place named Forestay, located in the south part of Chexbres, maybe, Chemin de la Plantaz. Can you double check, please? Terragio67 (talk) 03:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:40, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:53, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 14:35:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Printed#Posters and advertisements
- Info created by GTC, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Huge resolution of a poster of the 1900 Paris World Fair. -- Yann (talk) 14:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool, I can't view it in full size but it looks very sharp at 6000px across. Cmao20 (talk) 17:59, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:01, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:21, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2024 at 13:11:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
- Info Main nave of St. Ursula, Munich, Germany. The so called "Schwabing Cathedral" was inaugurated in 1897 and its exterior appearance is similar to the ta’ Pinu Basilica (Malta). c/u/n Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good, as usual Cmao20 (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:34, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:29, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 20:47:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Korea
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice interplay of light and shadows. Cmao20 (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Clear shot. --Mile (talk) 07:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 20:43:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Painted ceilings
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great motif, colours, and image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 01:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Peulle (talk) 10:49, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool stuff Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --C messier (talk) 20:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 11:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:18, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 17:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 19:46:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info created by Jef Leempoels - uploaded by Isha - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 19:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 19:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment the restoration procedure has deleted some wrinkles on the sleeve of the black jacket, while they are visible in the original picture. On the contrary, you have done a very good job on most of the other parts of the painting. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:01, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 15:44:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info created by Gzen92 - uploaded by Gzen92 - nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 15:44, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment why f/2,5? Ezarateesteban 19:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose 1) Perspective issues. All the buildings are leaning to the left. The middle building very heavily (check the clock tower). 2) The detail/compression is like from a smartphone. I have checked the camera from EXIF and surely it can produce much better quality ;-) --Lynx1211 (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice light and composition, very warm and inviting. Agree perspective correction could be better and level of detail is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 07:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittaculidae_(True_Parrots)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:35, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent, and worth pointing out that this is the only QI of this species on Commons, so it is probably the best free-license photo of this bird. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:52, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:08, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:09, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:12, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:22, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 14:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 01:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Blends in nicely. Wolverine XI 05:43, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2024 at 04:43:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Australia
- Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:46, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good technical rendition and certainly QI, but IMHO not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:43, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per GRDN711. -- Karelj (talk) 11:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with GRDN711, sorry. Maybe a more interesting sky and/or a long exposure to smooth out the water would take this to the next level? BigDom (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:19, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 22:04:57
- Info Much better copy: higher resolution, better colors, less compression, etc. (Original nomination)
- Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 22:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Wilfredor (talk) 23:14, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
Delist and replace--Zzzs (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per below. I now believe historical photos are superior to edited versions because they're, well, the original copy. --Zzzs (talk) 14:33, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Terragio67 (talk) 05:08, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral, I like the colors of the existing file, but the others’ comments are too numerous not to be convincing. - Jarrod Baniqued (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delist and replace --Thi (talk) 10:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep With a picture like 'Earthrise' that has gained so much of its value from its iconic status, it is IMO appropriate to feature the version of it that is most similar to the 'famous' version, as opposed to a version that may be of higher technical quality. The proposed replacement is clearly a better quality image but if we want to feature a good quality photo of the Earth above the lunar surface, we shouldn't feature this image at all because it has long been superseded by photos from new space probes. Its value comes from its historical and cultural importance, not its technical quality. The iconic version of the picture, the one used by most sources including NASA themselves, is the current FP, and so that is the one we should feature. See also 1, 2, 3. 16:03, 21 September 2024 (UTC)Cmao20 (talk)
- Keep I agree with Cmao20. --FreCha (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The two pictures are two different things, even though they reproduce the same data. The older one has an historical value. It has been reproduced as such on newspapers, books, stamps, etc.: en:Earthrise. The newer one shows a more realistic version of the other, as "it had must be" if all colours would had been well balanced. There is a lot of technical job behind, and it has also a very important value, but mainly in the comparison with the other one. According to me, the newer one deserves to be enlisted among the featured picture, but not in substitution of the other one. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2024 at 21:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Hungary
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by MrPanyGoff -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- MrPanyGoff 21:19, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sharp and attractively lit photo of interesting architecture. Sky is pretty bland, would be better still with a more interesting sky. Cmao20 (talk) 21:28, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice shot and looks like best available photo of this theater so far, but still I miss some more wow for an FP. --A.Savin 17:30, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:10, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco (المدرسة البوعنانية, ⴰⵙⵉⵏⴰⵏ ⴱⵓ ⵉⵏⴰⵏⵉⵢⴰ).jpg
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info Stucco decoration, Bou Inania Madrasa, Fez, Marocco, my shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting, but I miss the corner at the bottom . Cmao20 (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 23:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support The corner at the bottom ... :-( --XRay 💬 11:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @XRay, Cmao20 If you ask me, i would put even a bit higher. Bottom nothing while above nice crafting. Lost complete V, but... --Mile (talk) 17:46, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2024 at 13:21:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 395954
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522234
|
This is a picture of the protected area listed at WDPA under the ID 555522275
|
- Support -- Llez (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
-
weaksupport Beautiful but IMO oversharpened (haloes). Cmao20 (talk) 20:05, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- New version is a considerable improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 16:54, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
* Weak support Agree with Cmao20... --Terragio67 (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Well done, Support Terragio67 (talk) 18:41, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Info I made a new version from RAW with a bit less sharpening and without haloes. --Llez (talk) 10:45, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 07:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:27, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The haze makes the scene a bit too soft, IMO.--Peulle (talk) 10:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:03, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 15:40:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
- Info Schneespitze in the Stubai Alps seen on the ascent from the Magdeburg hut. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:21, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sharp image, great color contrast between the deep blue of the sky and the rust tinged rocks. Seems a little bit over sharpened at full resolution. Needsmoreritalin (talk) 02:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 12:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sure WB is fine, but noise for sure. --Mile (talk) 16:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a view! Wolverine XI 08:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 15:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 12:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Hirundo rustica Ormoz.jpg, featured
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2024 at 10:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Hirundinidae (Swallows)
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Yerpo — Yerpo Eh? 10:12, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 13:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not always that keen on birds on wires but this one is very sharp and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed (talk) 00:05, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:24, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:58, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Zzzs (talk) 22:40, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Sun 22 Sep → Fri 27 Sep Mon 23 Sep → Sat 28 Sep Tue 24 Sep → Sun 29 Sep Wed 25 Sep → Mon 30 Sep Thu 26 Sep → Tue 01 Oct Fri 27 Sep → Wed 02 Oct
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Wed 18 Sep → Fri 27 Sep Thu 19 Sep → Sat 28 Sep Fri 20 Sep → Sun 29 Sep Sat 21 Sep → Mon 30 Sep Sun 22 Sep → Tue 01 Oct Mon 23 Sep → Wed 02 Oct Tue 24 Sep → Thu 03 Oct Wed 25 Sep → Fri 04 Oct Thu 26 Sep → Sat 05 Oct Fri 27 Sep → Sun 06 Oct
Closing a featured picture promotion request
The bot
Note that the description below is for manual closure, this is mostly not needed anymore as there exists a bot (FPCBot) that counts the votes and handles the process below. However after the bot has counted the votes a manual review step is used to make sure the count is correct before the bot again picks up the work.
Manual procedure
Any experienced user may close requests.
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Bridge (August 2013).jpg). See also {{FPC-results-reviewed}}.
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=("yes" or "no")|gallery=xxx (leave blank if "featured=no")|sig=~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
featured or not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Also add the picture to the appropriate gallery and section of Commons:Featured pictures, list. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images. An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.
- Add the template {{Assessments|featured=1}} to the image description page.
- If it was an alternative image, use the subpage/com-nom parameter: For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use {{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}
- If the image is already featured on another wikipedia, just add featured=1 to the Assessments template. For instance {{Assessments|enwiki=1}} becomes {{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- Add the picture to the chronological list of featured pictures. Put it in the gallery using this format: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- The # should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other noms on that page for examples.
- You may simplify this if multiple things were done by the same user. E.g.: File:xxxxx.jpg|# - '''Headline'''<br>created, uploaded, and nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]
- Add == FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}} to the Talk Page of the nominator.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}ed, {{FPD}}ed and withdrawn nominations), open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you've just finished closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.
Closing a delisting request
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line with a space first)
'''Result:''' x delist, x keep, x neutral => /not/ delisted. ~~~~
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Astrolabe-Persian-18C.jpg) - Also edit the title of the delisting candidate image template and add after the image tag
delisted or not delisted
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] === becomes === [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the actual template from Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list to the bottom of the actual month page on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- Replace the template {{Featured picture}} on the image description page by {{Delisted picture}}. If using the {{Assessments}} template, change featured=1 to featured=2 (do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes).
- Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris).
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (d:Property:P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" from the picture's Structured data.
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in chronological list of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1-6) with (1-6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture in the gallery is not removed.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the above section. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Manual archiving of a withdrawn nomination
- In Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
In the occasion that the FPCbot will not mark withdrawn nominations with a "to be reviewed" template and put them in Category:Featured picture candidates awaiting closure review just like if they were on the usual list, put the following "no" template:
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=X|oppose=X|neutral=X|featured=no|gallery=|sig=--~~~~}} - Also edit the title of the candidate image template and add after the image tag
not featured
For example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], not featured === - Save your edit.
- Open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}
Copy it to the bottom of Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/September 2024), save that page, and remove it from the candidate list.