Commons:Administrators
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP
This page explains the role of administrators (sometimes called admins or sysops) on Wikimedia Commons. Note that details of the role, and the way in which administrators are appointed, may differ from other sites.
If you want to request administrator help, please post at Administrators' noticeboard.
There are currently 179 administrators on Commons.
What is an administrator?
Administrators as of September 2024 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 179
If 179 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Technical
Administrators are users with the technical ability on Wikimedia Commons to:
- delete and undelete images and other uploaded files, and to view and restore deleted versions
- delete and undelete pages, and to view and restore deleted revisions
- protect and unprotect pages, and to edit admin-protected pages
- block and unblock users, individual IP addresses and IP address ranges
- edit less-restricted interface messages (see also Commons:Interface administrators)
- rename files
- add and remove user groups
- configure Upload Wizard campaigns
- delete and undelete specific log entries and revisions of pages
- import pages from other wikis
- merge the history of pages
- modify abuse filters
- not create redirects from source pages when moving pages
- override the spoofing checks and title or username blacklist
- send a message to multiple users at once (massmessage)
- use higher limits in API queries
These are collectively known as the admin tools.
Community role
Administrators are experienced and trusted members of the Commons community who have taken on additional maintenance work and have been entrusted with the admin tools by public consensus/vote. Different admins have different areas of interest and expertise, but typical admin tasks include determining and closing deletion requests, deleting copyright violations, undeleting files where necessary, protecting Commons against vandalism, and working on templates and other protected pages. Of course, some of these tasks can be done by non-admins as well.
Administrators are expected to understand the goals of this project, and be prepared to work constructively with others towards those ends. Administrators should also understand and follow Commons' policies, and where appropriate, respect community consensus.
Apart from roles which require use of the admin tools, administrators have no special editorial authority by virtue of their position, and in discussions and public votes their contributions are treated in the same way as any ordinary editor. Some admins may become more influential, not due to their position as such, but from the personal trust they may have gained from the community.
Suggestions for administrators
Please read Commons:Guide to adminship.
Removal of administrator rights
Under the de-admin policy, administrator rights may be revoked due to inactivity or misuse of sysop tools. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Apply to become an administrator
All intending administrators must go through this process and submit themselves to RFA, including all ex-administrators who are seeking to return to their previous role.
First, go to Commons:Administrators/Howto and read the information there. Then come back here and make your request in the section below.
- After clicking the appropriate button and creating the subpage, copy the link to the subpage, e.g. "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edit Commons:Administrators/Requests and paste it in at the top of the section, then put it in double curly brackets (e.g. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) to transclude it. Request a watchlist notice at MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, or edit MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice to put up one if you are an administrator.
- If someone else nominated you, please accept the nomination by stating "I accept" or something similar, and signing below the nomination itself. The subpage will still need to be transcluded by you or your nominator.
Use the box below, replacing Username with your username: |
Voting
Any registered user may vote here although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted. It is preferable you give reasons for both Support and Oppose votes as this will help the closing bureaucrat in their decision. Greater weight is given to an argument, with supporting evidence if needed, than to a simple vote.
Promotion normally requires at least 75% in favour, with a minimum of 8 support votes. Votes from unregistered users are not counted. However, the closing bureaucrat has discretion in judging community consensus, and the decision will not necessarily be based on the raw numbers. Bureaucrats may, at their discretion, extend the period of an RfA if they feel that it will be helpful in better determining community consensus.
Neutral comments are not counted in the vote totals for the purposes of calculating pass/fail percentages. However, such comments are part of the discussion, may persuade others, and contribute to the closing bureaucrat's understanding of community consensus.
Purge the cache Use the edit link below to edit the transcluded page.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Bastique (talk · contributions · deleted user contributions · recent activity · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth) (Activity: Talk Commons DR)
- Scheduled to end: 21:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not going to be wordy. I was a Commons Administrator for 12 years, from 2006 to 2018, when I lost the status because of inactivity. Much of that was my career and slowly growing apart from the Wikimedia projects in general. But in the last couple of years I've increased my involvement in the projects, helping when I've found the time. And I managed to bring myself to Wikimania this year in Katowice, reacquainting myself with the community and meeting a huge number of new people.
I was satisfied with just being a contributor and reviewer, however, I understand there is a huge backlog of things that need to be done, and I felt compelled to ask for the administrator rights again so I can better help with tasks here.
Plus, I am committed to not falling into inactivity again! Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 21:39, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Votes
- Support They know how to do the job, and we could definitely use the help. Abzeronow (talk) 21:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
👍 modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 23:31, 24 September 2024 (UTC)- Support. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:35, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 01:08, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back.-- Mohammed Qays 🗣 02:49, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support welcome back old friend Bedivere (talk) 03:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fit India 06:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Gnom (talk) 06:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support welcome back Gnangarra 08:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Waqar💬 08:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose All due respect for your work, but IMHO flag should be granted also with regard of more recent activity... but as for Commons namespace (most relevant for admin work) unfortunately I see far less than 100 edits of yours in the last two years, and why should I presume it would be so much more in future? Sorry --A.Savin 08:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- i agree with a.savin. your activity is low. please be more active. thanks. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 11:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Experienced editor. T CellsTalk 16:38, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose seems like hatcollecting, not much recent activity. Didn't the user also work for WMF, but that no longer? ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 20:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- this is their personal account, Bastique was an employee when being an active contributor was considered a requirement and staff werent expected to take actions as employees. Gnangarra 00:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see the need for the admin tools -- DaxServer (talk) 20:34, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose after checking his contributions, it is really low amount for recent years. i believe you should do more and apply here later. sorry. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 23:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support User has a long history with proof he'll be a good admin. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back! RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Also low admin activity is helpful and welcome. --Achim55 (talk) 09:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--RZuo (talk) 09:45, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Hadi (talk) 13:30, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support as I see no apparent issues and Commons does need more admins. Welcome back. EPIC (talk) 15:39, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support, given that activity concerns will be addressed in future. Ratekreel (talk) 15:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Rather little recent activity on Commons --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Commons need more admins as it is a very backlogged project. If the user expects to become active again, and was an admin in the past, we should give them the toolbox. --A09 (talk) 18:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Welcome back to Commons, I have faith user will become more active again. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? -
uselesscontributions} 20:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC) - Support Welcome back amigo! --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 21:17, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- Support Any help is always appreciated, no matter how big or small. Jianhui67 T★C 06:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose too few contributions – increase activity here first and then request adminship, not the other way around...there's mountains of maintenance tasks here that can be done without admin rights. Per A.Savin. --Prototyperspective (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have over 14,500 contributions on Commons--so "too few contributions" is not a valid reason. See Gnangarra's statement below regarding Commons policy regarding re-adminship. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is a valid reason because 14,500 contributions isn't really much (albeit depending a lot on which kind of contributions you do) and, more importantly, because as a.savin said your recent contributions are low. I'd likely support if you get active first and then apply, why not spend a month or six contributing here as a normal user first? Agree with modern_primat that you should rather apply at another time. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Commons policy doesn't necessitate that I apply at another time when my recent contributions have stacked up to meet the original criteria for Administrator. Commons longstanding and stated policy is that "Administrators who have lost admin rights through inactivity but who expect to become active again may re-apply through the regular process". I was an administrator here for 14 years. I earned the community trust long ago. Re-adminship was never intended to be the inquisition it is on English Wikipedia. It was meant for those of us who have returned in good faith, once again able to take on the commitment of doing this entirely thankless job on Commons to do so. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 18:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- It is a valid reason because 14,500 contributions isn't really much (albeit depending a lot on which kind of contributions you do) and, more importantly, because as a.savin said your recent contributions are low. I'd likely support if you get active first and then apply, why not spend a month or six contributing here as a normal user first? Agree with modern_primat that you should rather apply at another time. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:04, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have over 14,500 contributions on Commons--so "too few contributions" is not a valid reason. See Gnangarra's statement below regarding Commons policy regarding re-adminship. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose kinda lazy bummer far less than 100 edits of yours in the last two years. Sorry, but motivation looks otherwise. --Mateus2019 (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
Comments
- What backlogs would you be helping with as an administrator? Because there are lots of backlogs which ordinary editors can help to reduce, like subcategories of Category:Categories requiring diffusion, Category:Files needing categories and probably much more in Category:Commons maintenance. --JopkeB (talk) 08:44, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- This isnt english wikipedia as per COM:DEADMIN Administrators who have lost admin rights through inactivity but who expect to become active again may re-apply through the regular process. there is no inquisition required for admins returning after inactivity. The specified requirement is that they expect to become active. Gnangarra 09:40, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for the information, I did not know that. JopkeB (talk) 09:51, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.